Charles Murray himself has never argued that there is definitive proof that the difference in IQ scores is based in genetics. The science just isn't there. However it's cowardice not to examine the question of whether a genetic contribution is plausible or not.
I would not be disappointed if there is no genetic contribution. But I would not be surprised if there is.
Charles Murray himself has never argued that there is definitive proof that the difference in IQ scores is based in genetics. The science just isn't there. However it's cowardice not to examine the question of whether a genetic contribution is plausible or not.
I would not be disappointed if there is no genetic contribution. But I would not be surprised if there is.
Charles Murray himself has never argued that there is definitive proof that the difference in IQ scores is based in genetics. The science just isn't there. However it's cowardice not to examine the question of whether a genetic contribution is plausible or not.
I would not be disappointed if there is no genetic contribution. But I would not be surprised if there is.