I mentioned this elsewhere but think it’s worth repeating.
If it is agreeable that the function of linguistic semiotics can lead to the production of culture, I think it is reasonable to make a distinction between the phenomenon of a unique sign language and culture developed in isolation, and the inherent disability present in the condit…
I mentioned this elsewhere but think it’s worth repeating.
If it is agreeable that the function of linguistic semiotics can lead to the production of culture, I think it is reasonable to make a distinction between the phenomenon of a unique sign language and culture developed in isolation, and the inherent disability present in the condition of being deaf.
I think the fixation on cultural identification as a replacement for social alienation, with the byproduct of self-aggrandizing narcissism, is where things go off the rails.
I mentioned this elsewhere but think it’s worth repeating.
If it is agreeable that the function of linguistic semiotics can lead to the production of culture, I think it is reasonable to make a distinction between the phenomenon of a unique sign language and culture developed in isolation, and the inherent disability present in the condition of being deaf.
I think the fixation on cultural identification as a replacement for social alienation, with the byproduct of self-aggrandizing narcissism, is where things go off the rails.