I think they should be fixed because they FAIRLY OR NOT can make a bad impression. We may not care, because we're paying subscribers and already fans, but for the public posts in particular I would like them to look as though they were read once over before hitting "post" and less like an email, ONLY because of the fact that people are j…
I think they should be fixed because they FAIRLY OR NOT can make a bad impression. We may not care, because we're paying subscribers and already fans, but for the public posts in particular I would like them to look as though they were read once over before hitting "post" and less like an email, ONLY because of the fact that people are judgmental, even when they think they aren't. Respectability politics!
I disagree. First, there are actually very few typos This is a very long piece and there are maybe three obvious ones. Most unfiltered writers (not all, but most) would have more errors in an article of this length. Second, the typos contribute to the fresh, vibrant, hot-off-the-press, no-fucks-given feel of this substack. Third, this guy is unique in the quantity, quality and frequency of his posting - I wouldn't want to dull that energy.
I think they should be fixed because they FAIRLY OR NOT can make a bad impression. We may not care, because we're paying subscribers and already fans, but for the public posts in particular I would like them to look as though they were read once over before hitting "post" and less like an email, ONLY because of the fact that people are judgmental, even when they think they aren't. Respectability politics!
I disagree. First, there are actually very few typos This is a very long piece and there are maybe three obvious ones. Most unfiltered writers (not all, but most) would have more errors in an article of this length. Second, the typos contribute to the fresh, vibrant, hot-off-the-press, no-fucks-given feel of this substack. Third, this guy is unique in the quantity, quality and frequency of his posting - I wouldn't want to dull that energy.