>In my opinion, one of the (many, vitally important) benefits of Ranked-Choice Voting is that if outsider parties- particularly those that have endured for a series of election cycles, like the Greens and the Libertarians- find that they've actually been allowed a path to compete with the Big Two, they might see clear to modifying some o…
>In my opinion, one of the (many, vitally important) benefits of Ranked-Choice Voting is that if outsider parties- particularly those that have endured for a series of election cycles, like the Greens and the Libertarians- find that they've actually been allowed a path to compete with the Big Two, they might see clear to modifying some of their more extravagant proposals in the direction of emphasizing practical achievements rather than ideological posturing.
I've never understood why those looking to break the two-party duopoly aren't the most fanatical popularists of all.
>In my opinion, one of the (many, vitally important) benefits of Ranked-Choice Voting is that if outsider parties- particularly those that have endured for a series of election cycles, like the Greens and the Libertarians- find that they've actually been allowed a path to compete with the Big Two, they might see clear to modifying some of their more extravagant proposals in the direction of emphasizing practical achievements rather than ideological posturing.
I've never understood why those looking to break the two-party duopoly aren't the most fanatical popularists of all.