Labelling it as such at least frames it accurately. But it doesn’t render it false either. To assume the assertion is insignificant or even false you have to account for the fact that he won against a couple of GOP establishment insiders and four years later a much less charismatic candidate with an inflated reputation lost on a technicality to the ultimate rogue outsider.
Labelling it as such at least frames it accurately. But it doesn’t render it false either. To assume the assertion is insignificant or even false you have to account for the fact that he won against a couple of GOP establishment insiders and four years later a much less charismatic candidate with an inflated reputation lost on a technicality to the ultimate rogue outsider.
I feel like people forget what was happening in the fall of 2008 under a Republican president. The world economy was on the brink of collapse. Any Democrat would have won.
Labelling it as such at least frames it accurately. But it doesn’t render it false either. To assume the assertion is insignificant or even false you have to account for the fact that he won against a couple of GOP establishment insiders and four years later a much less charismatic candidate with an inflated reputation lost on a technicality to the ultimate rogue outsider.
I feel like people forget what was happening in the fall of 2008 under a Republican president. The world economy was on the brink of collapse. Any Democrat would have won.
Bingo.