The breadth of "Marxist" thought makes it perfect "motte and bailey" material. Can we, perhaps, judge Marxism as a working political philosophy based on the outcomes it's achieved?
The breadth of "Marxist" thought makes it perfect "motte and bailey" material. Can we, perhaps, judge Marxism as a working political philosophy based on the outcomes it's achieved?
The breadth of "Marxist" thought makes it perfect "motte and bailey" material. Can we, perhaps, judge Marxism as a working political philosophy based on the outcomes it's achieved?