5 Comments

I forget who said this about Wurtzel, but they described her as being the ideal 90’s girlfriend.

Expand full comment

Enjoy your well-earned vacation!

Expand full comment

Love the book and substack recommendations. Also like the formatting and summaries - thank you for this!

Expand full comment
founding
May 3, 2021Liked by Freddie deBoer

re: Religion and whether people actually believed in them historically, that's one of the pet peeves of one of my favourite writers, Bret Devereaux. For anyone not familiar with him, he's a professional historian, and he's written a fair bit on the topic. Representative quote: "As I tell my students, it is safe to assume, as a general matter, that people in the past believed their own religion."

That comes from https://acoup.blog/2019/06/04/new-acquisitions-how-it-wasnt-game-of-thrones-and-the-middle-ages-part-ii/ and is part of a longer series of him rather grumpily tearing apart the historical accuracy of GoT. He also wrote an enjoyable series on how polytheism actually worked (https://acoup.blog/2019/10/25/collections-practical-polytheism-part-i-knowledge/) and a follow up on how people, historically, thought about oaths (https://acoup.blog/2019/06/28/collections-oaths-how-do-they-work/).

The upshot is: Yes, people in the past really did believe in this stuff. And, I think just as obviously, plenty of people today still do.

Expand full comment
May 3, 2021Liked by Freddie deBoer

David Chapman has some good posts on both how weird historical (and much of modern non-western) Buddhism is to western liberal sensibilities, as well as on the topic of how Buddhism was modernized for explicitly nationalist purposes (and with a western intellectual audience in mind). One of my favorites in that vein: https://vividness.live/the-king-of-siam-invents-western-buddhism The series outline is here: https://vividness.live/the-crumbling-buddhist-consensus-summary

Expand full comment